Trump calls on NATO to back Greenland demands ahead of talks

Sara Sjolin and Ott Ummelas, Bloomberg News on Jan 14, 2026

By clicking submit, I authorize Arcamax and its affiliates to: (1) use, sell, and share my information for marketing purposes, including cross-context behavioral advertising, as described in our Privacy Policy , (2) add to information that I provide with other information like interests inferred from web page views, or data lawfully obtained from data brokers, such as past purchase or location data, or publicly available data, (3) contact me or enable others to contact me by email or other means with offers for different types of goods and services, and (4) retain my information while I am engaging with marketing messages that I receive and for a reasonable amount of time thereafter. I understand I can opt out at any time through an email that I receive, or by clicking here

U.S. President Donald Trump repeated his demand for the U.S. to take control of Greenland for national security reasons before a meeting of top diplomats in Washington and called on NATO to support his efforts.

“NATO becomes far more formidable and effective with Greenland in the hands of the UNITED STATES,” the president said in a social media post Wednesday. “Militarily, without the vast power of the United States, much of which I built during my first term, and am now bringing to a new and even higher level, NATO would not be an effective force or deterrent - Not even close! They know that, and so do I.”

Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen and his counterpart from Nuuk, Vivian Motzfeldt, will meet with Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in an effort to convince the U.S. administration that there’s no need to take over the Arctic island - a semi-autonomous territory under the Kingdom of Denmark. The meeting, scheduled to begin at 10:30 Eastern Time, is being cast in Danish media as one of the most decisive moments for the Kingdom since World War II.

Danish Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen on Wednesday announced plans to beef up his country’s military presence in the far North but in a follow up post, Trump poured scorn on the idea that the Danish military would be able to deter the Russia and China from operating off the coast of Greenland as the Arctic takes on increasing geopolitical importance.

“NATO: Tell Denmark to get them out of here, NOW! Two dogsleds won’t do it! Only the USA can!!!” Trump said. The president also underlined that Greenland is vital to his plans for a so-called Golden Dome to defend the U.S. from missile attacks.

Ahead of the meeting in Washington, Greenland’s prime minister, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, threw his weight behind the current union, categorically ruling out joining the U.S. and said that if made to choose, the territory would opt for Denmark.

Trump has declined to rule out the use of military force to get the world’s biggest island although Rubio has argued that the goal is to buy Greenland. The Danes have said it’s not theirs to sell, and Greenlanders insist that there’s no amount of money that could buy their “national soul.”

For the Danes, Vance’s role hosting Wednesday’s meeting alongside Rubio raises concerns. While Rubio is known to be more conciliatory in private despite embracing Trump’s aggressive approach in public, the vice president shares his boss’s penchant for disruptive and unpredictable dealmaking.

The Danes argue that a comprehensive defense agreement dating back to 1951 already allows the U.S. to use the territory as it needs to for defenses — rendering any takeover futile.

In addition to increasing its own military presence and coordinating with NATO, Denmark could also offer to grant Washington expanded access.

Another move labeled the off-ramp option would be for Greenland to offer Trump a Ukraine-style minerals deal where the U.S. gets access to the island’s rare earths in exchange for security guarantees. Such an agreement would allow Trump to claim victory without annexation and shift the focus from geopolitics to commercial success.

If the U.S. decides it has to have Greenland, there are different assessments of how events could unfold.

The U.S. could deploy additional troops in Greenland under the existing defense agreement, which imposes few formal constraints on expanding its military presence in Greenland, provided it notifies Copenhagen and Nuuk.

Once in place, those forces could move beyond routine activities to take control of government functions and key institutions. It is this shift in purpose — rather than troop numbers — that would signal an occupation, allowing control to be established with far less drama than a conventional invasion.

Under a much less likely scenario, the U.S. could take Greenland by force, seizing key infrastructure. Trump has already bombed Nigeria and extracted Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro in a raid on Caracas, showing such options are in the toolkit. While the U.S. would almost certainly prevail militarily, Danish forces would be legally obliged to resist, raising the risk of casualties and imposing heavy political costs.

----------

—With assistance from Sanne Wass, Iain Rogers, Samy Adghirni and Naomi Tajitsu.